"org.graalvm.polyglot.PolyglotException: not found" when running in parallel
See original GitHub issueMinimal repro: zip attached
This project contains a shared feature, which defines which defines a javascript function:
Scenario: shared functions
* def greet = function(name) { return "hello " + name; }
* print greet
There are then three “caller” features, each containing a “Background” that calls the “shared” feature:
Background:
* def functions = call read('classpath:/examples/utils/shared.feature')
Each caller than has five scenarios which call the function with a parameter and assert the result.
Scenario: call 1-1
* def greeting = call functions.greet "test11"
* print greeting
* match greeting == "hello test11"
[repeats]
If I use Runner.path("classpath:/examples").parallel(1); then everything passes.
But with Runner.path("classpath:/examples").parallel(5); most of the scenarios pass, but some fail at the “Background” step:
classpath:examples/features/caller3.feature:4
* def functions = call read('classpath:/examples/utils/shared.feature')
>>>> js failed:
01: read('classpath:/examples/utils/shared.feature')
<<<<
org.graalvm.polyglot.PolyglotException: not found: /examples/utils/shared.feature
- com.intuit.karate.resource.ResourceUtils.getResource(ResourceUtils.java:118)
- com.intuit.karate.core.ScenarioFileReader.toResource(ScenarioFileReader.java:128)
- com.intuit.karate.core.ScenarioFileReader.readFile(ScenarioFileReader.java:63)
- com.intuit.karate.core.ScenarioEngine.lambda$new$0(ScenarioEngine.java:118)
- <js>.:program(Unnamed:1)
I’m on: Karate 1.0.0 (this works on 0.9.6) Windows 10 Version 2004 19041.804 Java 11.0.9 (Oracle Corporation 11.0.9+7-LTS)
Gradle version 6.3 (though our very-not-minimal “real” project is using gradle wrapper 6.8.3 and has the same problem)
I run this with the command gradle build
This feels close enough to https://github.com/intuit/karate/issues/1515 to make me suspect they may be related, but the Exception and stack don’t match.
Issue Analytics
- State:
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments:17 (9 by maintainers)
Top Related StackOverflow Question
Yes, the full-fat “real” test pack has spring-boot in play.
I think I followed the local build steps correctly, and everything seems to pass (both the minimal-repro test included above, and our “real” test pack) with the development version. Thanks!
to everyone commenting here, please try and submit a sample project following the process. it isn’t too hard. I’m locking this thread now